Purely Commentary Andrei Sakharov, the Consistent, Fearless Russian Scientist Who Unhesitatingly Defends Jewish Rights, and the Contrasts in Solzhenitsyn's Approaches. By Philip Slomovitz Sakharov the Courageous Dissident Contracts With Solzhenitzyn Whose Libertarianism is Questioned Many of Soviet Russia's dissidents, the protesters Perhaps it is because he gusted with Stalin. I never who have defied suppression of free speech, have evi- dislikes Stalin's commu- felt toward the Russian dic- denced great courage in their demands for justice. Per- nism—and Lenin's—that he tator anything else but hor- haps the most consistent among the non-Jews in that can not restrain himself to ror, in the strongest sense category of brave people is Andrei Sakharov, the praise the regime that pre- of the word. But why com- very eminent nuclear physicist. At every opportunity, ceded it. pare him with Hitler? Why whenever a representative of the American government He compares the two not with Ivan the Terrible visited Russia, he unhesitatingly expressed his support eras, the two systems and or Genghis Khan? And why of the right of Jews who desire to leave for Israel to it is clear which is his pref- compare their victims? By be granted exit visas. erence: In czarist times, what right? And for what fewer people were impris- ends? Why is he so eager He has supported the efforts of U.S. Senator Henry oned, for shorter periods of Jackson in pressing for freedom of emigration for Rus- to dramatize his tragedy time, under less repugnant sian Jews. He reiterated that view when U.S. Senator while belittling o u r s? conditions. Solzhenitsyn re- Doesn't he knoW that there James L. Buckley visited Moscow. He supported Sen. turns to these points fre- exists a level of suffering Buckley's suggestion that an ad hoc committee be formed to monitor whether the USSR is keeping its reported quently without ever recall- where two times two do not ing the anti-Jewish laws, pledge to permit the exit of 60,000 Russian Jews yearly. make four? And that' there the pogroms, the massacres exists, in evil, a limit be- There is a contrast to the sentiments of Sakharov in which the Jews were yond which comparisons are In the attitude of the much wider acclaimed Aleksandr often the only victims. An no longer relevant? Solzhenitsyn. The latter's alleged liberalism is ques- omission which, one more I repeat: It pains me to tioned on occasions, yet the notoriety he has achieved time, can only hurt us. have to speak of this. But seems to have prevented many from analyzing him fear- As we are hurt by other silence here would mean lessly. Elie Wiesel, the famed and brilliant interpreter comparisons of his pen. In- acquiescence. Thus, trea- of the after effects of the Holocaust, was not deterred tentional or not, conscious- son. The domain of the Holo- by the prominence of Nobel Prize-winning from indi_ ly or not, they are directed caust itself has become a eating the Solzhenitsyn shortcomings. In an essay in kind of no man's land in the Bnai Brith national magazine on 'the subject "Where against us. To undeeine Stalinist literature. People write Solzhenitsyn Troubles Me", he .expressed his chagrin, in- atrocities, he compares about it — anything, any- viting added attention to what must be viewed as an where. They compare Har- expose of the acclaimed Russian writer. While commenc- them to Hitler's horrors. And there again, it's Hitler lem to the Warsaw ghetto, ing with the hope that he might have joined the ad- who—excuse the expression Vietnam to Auschwitz. One mirers of Solzhenitsyn, Wiesel proceeded to list the faults, —comes out better. More dares to try to say the in- stating with reference to his "Gulag Archipelago": moderate, more rational, deScribable, to imagine the Certain events are de- have said to myself—and I less ferocious, more human unimaginable: One writes scribed here for the first continue to say — that a than Stalin. Listen to this: novels of fiction on themes time; others shock us by great writer, speaking in Solzhenitsyn declares that which the survivors sup- their interpretations. One the name of conscience and the NKVD was more cruel press in themselves, in the touched me particularly: its requirements, cannot re- than the Gestapo. Why? Be- burning silence of their In my Jels of Silence, I main blind to Jewish suffer- cause, the Gestapo tortured - glances. One treads on it reported rumors to the ef- ing, he has to be moved or, prisoners in order to dis- all without even ,thinking fect that Stalin, shortly be- at least, interested. cover the truth . . . Else- of apologizing. fore his death, decided to where—or is it in the same I hope very much that First of all, he deals lit- deport all the Jews to Si- tle, very little, with Stalin's work?—he announces sim- Solzhenitsyn will revise his beria. Solzhenitsyn confirms Jewish victims. When he ply that Hitler's crimes opinions one day; or, at the rumor and adds details: does deal with them, he pale before Stalin's: Hitler least, that he will explain The dictator prepared a killed only 6,000,000 Jews. does it almost in passing, them—if for nothing else; public hanging of "the while Stalin massacred in order to reassure some in footnotes. However, we treacherous Jewish doctors" 20,000,000 people. of his Jewish admirers who at Red Square, followed by know very well that Stalin The great English critic, would want to like him and nurtured a black and sick pogroms, with the partici- George Steiner, denounced admire him without reser- hatred for Jews—and Juda- pation of the enraged popu- recently Solzhenitsyn's bi- vations. The ambiguity does ism. Solzenitsyn is not even lace; the Jews would have zarre attitudes toward Jews been deported after that in curious to analyze the mo- and found his comparisons not suit him; rather, it will order to assure their safe- tives and implications of obscene; I agree with condemn him. That is what would sadden us. For Solz- that hatred: How could this ty • . . Steiner's revulsion. not astonish us? henitsyn's sake. It is natural that we read I don't mind that Solz- We, after all, have seen He talks at length about this work, despite its length- henitsyn wants us to be dis- others. the persecution of priests— Mess and heaviness here Much earlier than the appearance of the Wiesel but not the persecution of and there, with sustained article, Mikhail Grobman, a Russian Jewish artist who interest: We want to know rabbis,talmudistsand settled in Israel, wrote bitterly charging that Solzhe- what happened there, in, thinkers, those who main- tained the yeshivot. He de- nitsyn was a non-libertarian in an article in the Jerusa- the country of the revolu- lem Post, two years ago under the heading "Solzhe- scribes the m ea sures tion where people seemed nitsyn Does Not Deserve' His Reputation As Lover Of to have accepted a new law against the church—but not Liberty." He leveled serious accusations at the Nobel those against the syna- announced by a new mes- Prize winner. Here are portions of his declaration: gogue. He dwells on the siah. often heroic torments of be- Solzhenitsyn has of late political life.. Solzhenitsyn And yet, I find this book lieving Christians—but says been raised on a pedestal is a typical chauvinist, with disturbing not only because nothing about the pain and as a defender of freedom. all that this implies. His of its political and legal im-, the resistance of the be- Is .this reputation deserved? chauvinism differs of course plications, but because of lieving Jew. There is no doubt that from the official chauvin- its author. In other words, Still more surprising: He Solzhenitsyn is one Of the ism of today's Russia. For it is the writer who troubles is silent on the crimes per- few writers in Russia who example, the official func- me as much as his book petrated against Jewish had the courage to write tionaries as a rule ignore fills me with enthusiasm. culture and its spokesmen. steadfastly and' consistently the role played by Jews in Let me explain—and be- He says nothing about their about the atrocities and the Russian Revolution al- live me - I do so not without disappearance. Not h i n g mockeries of the Stalin era, though it is hard to do SQ. sadness. about the arrest of Jewish although it should be added Solzhenitsyn, on the other It has to do with Solzhe- artists, nothing on their ex- 1. that he described life in the hand, tends rather to blame nitsyn's attitude toward the ecutions in the cellars of Stalin concentration camps the Revolution on the Jews, Jewish tragedy under Stalin the NKVD. Nothing on the in considerably subdued as do the Russion "Black- and under Hitler; it is that murders of Mikhoels, Ber- tones. He himself experi- Hundred" nationalists who which troubles and hurts gelson, Der Nister or Mar- enced conditions in the oppose the Communist 're- me. kish. He did not knew them prisons and concentration gime. The Russian people is To be truthful, I have personally — be that the camps, and justifiably, has thus presented as a victim heard rumors here and case. But his account is full no wish to forgive the exe- of unforgiving J e w i s h there — insinuations ' which of stories which did not cutioners their crimes. But cruelty—a highly popular sought to denigrate his hu- touch him personally. This justified vengence is one concept among today's anti- manism. Certain people book is not an autobiog- thing, and the positive world Communist Black Hun- have claimed that he does raphy but a summation of outlook of a champion of dreds. not like Jews, or, at least, biographies: How to explain freedom quite another. Solz- Solzhenitsyn's. novel, "The that their fate does not in- that biographies of Jewish henitsyn lacks the latter. First Cii'cle," is frankly di- terest him. I refused to be- martyrs are missing? Is it One aspect of his work rected against the Jews. lieve these rumors. I have possible that, among his se- particularly highlights the The novel contains a num- said to myself—and I con- cret informers, there wasn't author's blood ties with the ber of Jewish characters, tinue to say—that a great anyone to inform him, if traditional anti-liberal struc- and they are, without ex- writer cannot be an anti- indeed he wanted to know? ture that is a feature of ception, scoundrels, traitors Semite, he cannot refuse his His exaggerated love of Russia's entire history. This and provocateurs. The best compassion and his help to czarism disturbs me. Ile is the Jewish question, among them, the repressed seems to have a limitless victims of the most tenaci- which has been and remains Communist Rubin, is a nor ous hatred in history. I enthusiasm for the czar. the touchstone of modern mal enough person in every- - day life, but ideologically official careers of the Chek- — a convinced Stalinist ist-Jews. He does not posess hangman. This is a Jew sufficient humane feeling convicted of economic for more than that. crimes who turns out to be a paid informer. This is a In the author's remark- jailbird-Jew, a Chekist- ably candid play, "Deer Jew. and Shack," a Jewish vil- Solzhenitsyn does not lain intrigues against 2- paint his Ghekist-Jews ex- honest front-line fights and joins other scoundrels clusively in black colors, in storming prisoners. A -!‘ but this makes the author's position even more danger- pulsively familiar plot, t ous and jesuitical. There is this time from the pen an interesting episode in an alleged "fighter for which t h e Chekist-Jew, truth." Yet Solzhenitsyn was well aware of the rela- sensing imminent danger tively high percentage of from his own organization, Jewish intellectuals in the in a burst of semi-remorse recalls a childhood incident. concentration camps of the There is a passage in which time, and how courageously a group of pioneers and and honorably they en- adults, led by a Jew, tor- dured years and decades in ture to death a Russian conditions where man turn- boy because he defends ed into beast. What a another boy, an anti-Semite. treacherous stab in the The sauce in which Solz- back of his erstwhile corn- henitsyn serves up this epi- rades in misfortune! Not a sode in no way differs from word about them, as though the feuilletons during the they did not exist, struggle, period of the "rootless cos- suffer, as if they are not mopolitans." Moreover, Solz- buried in. the frozen -soil! henitsyn presents the ugli- It would appear that there est period of this "cosmo- were only Jewish hangmen politanism" as a time which -and Jews who directly reverberated sadly , on the helped the hangmen. It would have been better if a Solzhenitsyn record could be judged as glorious and above reproach. But a writer with fame like his must not be kept disguised while the facts negate his elevation to a role as a freedom fighter. The Sakharov-Solzhenitsyn contrast is a necessity in the study of personalities and ideologies as they relate to Russia, the Russian Jews, and the total setting relating to the battle of liberty and justice in the land of Com- munism. ' Institute Movie Tours Israel Safed, centuries-old Jewish seat of learning, is one of the highlights of the movie, "Let's Tour Israel," at the Detroit Institute of Arts. "Let's Tour Israel," a documentary c o I o r movie showing the Jewish people and their dynamic nation(will be presented for the World Adventure Series at 3 p.m. Dec. 8, in the Detroit Insti- tute of Arts Auditorium. Sid Dodson, world traveler and professional film pro- ducer, covers every corner of peacetime Israel in his movie, from the Lebanese border to the Red Sea and from the Jordan River to Tel Aviv. He started his tour at Lod Airport filming all the sights of modern Tel Aviv and the port cities of Jaffa, Haifa and Acre, and Rosh Hanikra on the Lebanese border. In Jerusalem, Dodson pic- tures the united city with 'growing suburbs, the Knes- set, priceless sculptures in the Billy Rose Gardens, the crowded bazaars in the old quarter, pious Jews praying at the Western Wall and the stirring Independence Day Parade. Other sequences highlight life at Kibutz Degania, two immigrant towns, the stra- tegic Golan Heights, Mt. Hermon, camping in the Huleh Valley, Safed, Masa- da, Bethlehem, Nazareth, the Sea of Galilee and the Dead Sea. For information, call the World Adventure Series, TE 2-7676, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Friday. 2 Friday, Nov. 29, 1974 THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS —