Gromylio's Role ,Exposed by M. S. Arnoni; Minority of One Article Traces USSR Role Russia's intransigent pro-Arab role at the United Nations and the new anti-Israel position taken by Andrei A. Gromyko are analyzed in one of the most important reviews of the Middle East situation written by M. S. Arnoni, editor of The Minority of One, in the current issue of his magazine. Arnoni (see Sept. 8 Jew ish News Commentary, commending Arnoni's review of the existing situation) touches, in his long essay, on every factor in the Middle East situation, and in his references to the Russian position, he exposes the inconsistencies of Russia's spokes- men. In the course of his comments on the USSR pro-Arab activities he writes: Indirectly, the Soviet Union bears , be objective and also to display that a heavy share of responsibility for I human compassion and understand- Israel's Western orientation. No- i ing for the tragedy of the Jews where is a switch to a balanced which one would expect of a coun- foreign policy and to support of try that had been overrun by Nazi national liberation movements hordes. more easily imaginable than in Much of what Soviet spokesmen Israel. To begin with, the Israeli saying then applies with Left is a powerful and economi- were force today, even if, for cally entrenched force. Together equal reasons of their own, today's Rus- with the moderate Left it consti- sian diplomats choose to be obliv- tutes a vast and politically sophis- ious to this. It is particularly rel- ticated majority. Had the Soviet evant to recall some of the things Union held out the prospect of bet- which Andrei Gromyko stated on ter relations between the two coun- 14, 1947, before the UN Gen- tries and had she attempted to MaY serve as a bridge to some of the eral Assembly: The Jewish people suffered ex- Arab governments, the Israeli Left would have gotten all it ever need- treme misery and deprivation during the war. It can be said a significant change. effect ed to But the Soviet Union has made the without exaggeration that the sufferings and miseries of the Israeli Left sterile, unable to pre- sent to the nation a practical al- Jewish people are beyond des- ternative. It is a measure of the cription. It would be difficult to deep roots of the Israeli Left that express by mere dry figures the in spite of this it manages to retain losses and sacrifices of the Jew- ish people at the hands of the its amazing strength. It is no accident that Israel has fascist occupiers. In the terri- for all these years been cold- tories where the Ilitlerites were shouldered by the Soviets. For Is- in control, the Jews suffered rael's foreign policy is probably almost complete extinction. The precisely what the Soviet Union total number of the Jews who wants it to be. It enables the USSR fell at the hands of the fascist to put herself in the position of hangmen is something in the champion of the Arab cause. It neighborhood of 6,000,000 . . . would not pay for the Soviet Union It may be asked whether the to trade the enthusiasm of the Arab United Nations, considering the world for a greater international very serious situation of hun- balance in small Israel's foreign dreds of thousands of Jews who policy. That's why the Soviet Un- have survived the war, should ion has consistently abstained from not show an interest in the situ- any gesture toward the Israeli Left ation of these people who have that might have increased its influ- been uprooted from their coun- ence on the country's external or- tries and from their homes . . . The fact that not a single West- ientation . . . ern European state has been in a Soviet 'Zionism' position to guarantee the defense In 1947. when the issue of Pales- of the elementary rights of the tine was being debated in the Un- Jewish people or compensate ited Nations, the Soviet position them for the violence they have was determined by considerations suffered at the hands of the fasc- quite different from its present ist hangmen explains the aspira- ones. Its political end then having tions of the Jews for the creation been the removal of British colon- of a state of their own. It would ial dominv tion, the USSR was sup- be unjust not to take this into porting the Jewish independence account and to deny the right struggle. It could then afford to of the Jewish people to the reali- zation of such an aspiration. And then Mr. Gromyko addressed himself to the respective historic rights of Arabs and Jews in Pales- tine: described in the General Assem- bly's general debate over the week- end by USSR Foreign Minister warned that Israel would face sanc- tions if it did not comply with the United Nations resolutions invali- dating Israel's occupation of Jeru- salem, and demanded that Israel pay for damages inflicted on the Arab states as a result of the war. As for sanctions, which he said should be voted by the Security Council, Gromyko threatened that the Soviet Union would "be ready to participate in the implementa- tion of that decision." The rejection of Gromyko's stand was voiced by a spokesman for the Israeli delegation, who pointed out that the Soviet Union's demands r?a - and proposals were precisely the ones that had previously been "em- phatically rejected" by the emer- gency special session of the Gen- eral Assembly and by the Security Council. A preview of his position at the General Assembly was given by Eban in an address before the Edward R. Murrow World Affairs Forum of the Overseas Press Club, in New York. Eban declared that "in direct negotiations with Arab governments, Israel will present specific and tangible proposals compatible with the sovereign rights, mutual interests and na- tional dignity of all Middle East- ern states." He said "every Arab state which negotiates with us will Grandchildren of Writer Mendele improve its own prospects of stabil- ity and economic progress, as well Sue for Royalties on Sales in Israel as advancing the welfare of our (Direct JTA Teletype Wire legal name was Shalom Abramo- common region." to The Jewish News) Eban added that "on the other witz, died in Odessa in 1917. The TEL AVIV—Four grandchildren four claimants told the district hand, the principles adopted by the of the late Mendele Mocher Sefo- court here which opened hearings Arab summit conference at Khar- rim, a pioneer classicist of Yiddish in the case, that they should be toum — 'no recognition, no negotia- literature, filed claims here Tues- recognized as the famous writer's tion, no peace' — are simply a pre- day for royalties they say are due sole heirs. Although the USSR scription for immobility. The result them from the sale of their grand- broke diplomatic relations with Is- of this policy can only be the in- father's works in Israel. Of the rael after the outbreak of the Six- definite continuation of the cease- four, three are Russian citizens, Day War last June, the attorney fire situation. Israel is ready for sons of the writer's daughter, Nade- for the claimants satisfied the this result if it is forced upon her, zhda. The fourth is the son of court that he was given power of but she has not renounced the bet- Michael Rabinowitz of Belgium, a attorney by Moscow before the 're- ter hope of a negotiated peace es- son of Mendele. lations were severed. The court tablishing the new political, juri- dical, territorial and security con- Mendele Mocher Seforim, whose continued the hearings. ditions on which the Middle East- THE DETROIT =Magi NEWS ern future must be built." 411--Fridav Contenikar /4. 141/17 Andrei A. Gromyko. Gromyko spoke Friday and called for withdrawal of Israel's armed ' forces from the areas it occupied as a result of the Six-Day War in June. Ile again demanded that Is- rael draw back to the Arab-Israel armistice lines that were in ex- istence as of June 5, the day the Israeli-Arab war broke out. He sions were rising in the Middle East, the Soviet Union was dis- playing amazing calm. Even after the United Arab Re- public evicted the UN troops and imposed a blockade on the Gulf of Aqaba, the Soviet UN delegate, Dr. Fedorenko, time and again found it "necessary to stress" that the Soviet Union "does not see sufficient grounds for such a hasty convening of the Security Council and the artificially dramatic cli- mate. . . ." Now, a war later, even the solu- tions of the Vietnamese and Mid- dle Eastern crises are presented by the USSR and France as being interdependent. All this suggests that the USSR may have wished for a Middle Eastern conflict in order to create pressure for an American let-up in Vietnam. The theory might have been that a Middle Eastern con- flict, with its inherent threat of escalating respective big power in- volvement, would be so unaccept- able to a Vietnam-preoccupied United States, as to induce nego- tiated settlements in both areas. If this is indeed what has been on the Soviet (and French) leaders' minds, then the scheme involves particularly Machiavellian cyni- cism that some day might call for all kinds of unfair sacrifices on the part of any small country. We have to bear in mind the incontestable fact that the pop- ulation of Palestine consists of two peoples, Arabs and Jews. Each of these has its historical roots in Palestine. That country has become the native land of both these peoples, and both of them occupy an important place in the country economically and culturally. If this sounds to some like "Zion- ism," they had better be reminded that the speaker was neither Ben- Gurion nor Eshkol, but an official representative of the Soviet Union. Ironically, Mr. Gromyko's guide- line for a solution was compatible with that preached by Zionist; in- compatible with that preached by the Arabs. And the same holds true about that guideline even today: Neither history nor the condi- tions which have arisen in Pal- estine now can justify any uni- lateral solution of the Palestine problem either in favor of the creation of an independent Arab state, ignoring the lawful rights of the Jewish people, or in favor of the creation of an indepen- dent Jewish state, ignoring the lawful rights of the Arab popu- lation. . . . A just settlement can be found only if account is HEBREW SELF-TAUGHT taken in sufficient degree of the lawful interests of both peoples. BY AHARON ROSEN What has changed, since the day when these "Zionist" arguments of late plan, program 11'1?r;) .471 -itirtn .476 Mr. Gromyko's had been uttered, i tokh - neet m'oo-bahr to make his speeches of today so camp different in assumptions, tone and corner .477 nlnn .4 72 impact? What, instead, enables him rnah-bahne pee-nah and his colleagues now to display play (m.s.) such utter one-sidedness of con- he prepn:..d .478 17 7 r' .4 73 heh-kheen m'sah-behk cerns and to speak of Israel's right of survival in sufficiently meaning- launder (m.s.) permitted o457? .479 `11';17] .474 less and non-enforceable terms so m'khah-behss moo-tahr as to disturb not even the most even (even though) Vp p ti .475 virulent Arab chauvinist? What cook (m.s.) 5tig=71 .480 enables them to talk of Hitler's m'vah-shehl ah-fee-loo victims as his spiritual successors? Are not the Israeli Jews the same t.tt, ti7v471 ,51t•n r3 , 5 , 1173 ones who for two decades have • ;Iry been suing the Arabs for coexis- tence while the Arabs have been - 'fin nn31 kv;ri? 17?'1* tin'? TT 131a5 nmran - rejecting co-existence as out of the zaps:1.51174 r?0 question? 13 7111 •Ir"$ What has changed is but one Tnyinn 0457 ,n - mr, 5V? rrnirci rrmn factor: the objective of Soviet di- plomacy in the Middle East. In .nginn 1:11P7 n'11 1947, it was to weaken the British 10 3 D' colonial hold on the Middle East; Mgt - ,niispro wiv4n lannitg ,n;Vin Gromykoss Demands Rejected by Israel UNITED NATIONS (JTA) — The Israeli delegation reacted sharply to the Soviet position re- garding the Israeli-Arab crisis as today, it is to curry favor with the Arab states, such as they are. And because the objective of So- viet policy has changed, its au- thors claim full liberty to re-write history, distort facts and to serve expediency by obliviousness to once-cherished affirmations of life, construction and coexistence - . . Soviet and French leaders have been linking the Middle East and Vietnam conflicts. The Soviet Union has encouraged Arab belli- cosity in many ways. One of them was to supply sophisticated arms, precipitating a hazardous and ex- hausting regional arms race. An- other involved a strange diplo- matic incident. Israel's Foreign Minister Abba Eban related in the UN General Assembly that his prime minister was confronted, on the night of May 28, 1967, by the Soviet ambassador with the complaint of heavy troop concen- trations on Israel's northern fron- tier. When the ambassador was offered at that very moment to visit any part of Israel, he "brus- quely refused." The implication is clear that the Soviet Union was not going to risk a desirable fiction by exposing it to verification. It needed this fiction in order, as President Nasser has admitted on June 9, 1967, to alarm the Arabs about an alleged impending Is- raeli attack against Syria. As ten- rirn n5t0 ry5i-pn t3'1.111t1Vg nktn • rpniaml ,1o557 tl??y17; ,trp5nr? n' -r'' ,nio55n Trginn non vir4 5 1:1"117'1 "HIM nrrn ')T1151 its7.5 1-17;17, .7 ,r17?ki4 DV11 .n4n,m5 on3 rix crn5it7 raninn - .nty prite? mnn5 Tnto:- - trpn . ,nii5.47,4 nrinfi? 1'1 ;12? •DT,41,7? Pr1 • 07 rx r?ri? trzt-Irj nyi5y -Iii, ?n,4rin 1 ravt ,13'] `7 'AP'? 117?? telh n'PrIrl .nrra5 trkt*i, ainnitg isi5v 15pli .1t5 - nnin5 nhV? 11'51,7 .1rpv? rt,;;;I'? Inn ,55n 1;9 .11t71; min'? nn 145 nvii, m1i tiktu - ?trit? niptp minV? 75 51 71 . 11171i' ,55n 517 1415 urpi tr5 ,1* 5,rjn1 .5h55 rib arrie ,n? ?rpm= i71E1n4 .127114 517 547: niryan -5nat?-! mn? 51t7;n nit in*r ra3 t31 Mane; t';': — .qnk e'Q-nr sviv T Trwri) Reading material in vocalized Easy Hebrew, and also material for advanced students may be obtained through your local Hebrew Organization or by writing to: Brit Ivrit Olamit, P.O.B. 7111, Jerusalem, Israel. Published b7 &it Ivrit Olamit