„ Purely Commentary By PHILIP SLOMOVITZ An American Principle: Total Separation of Church and State In their statement to the U. S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary in opposition to Senate Joint Resolution No. 87, which seeks to establish Constitutional recognition of "the authority and law of Jesus Christ. Savior and Ruler of Nations,” the Synagogue Council of America and the National Community Relations Ad- visory Council offered a sound analysis of the proposal and re- viewed the history of similar resolutions which date back to 1863, when the sponsoring organization, the National Reform Associa- tion, first began to propagate such ideas. Senator Ralph Flanders, Vermont Republican, is, the author of the present resolution. He is reported :to have the backing of Senator William Langer of North Dakota. The National Reform Association which includes representa- tives of several Protestant denominations, continues its 90-year- old effort to secure realization of its principal purpose . . "to secure such an amendment to the Constitution of the United States as will declare the nation's allegiance to Jesus Christ and its acceptance of the moral laws of the Christian religion, and so indicate that this is a Christian nation, and place all the Chris- tian laws, institutions, and usages of our government on an un- deniably legal basis in the fundamental law of the land." The dangers inherent in such a proposal were frankly out- lined by a spokesman for the National Reform Association, David McAllister, who stated in his history of this association that if the proposed Christian amendment were adopted those who "do not seek to fall in with the majority . . must abide the conse- quences, or seek some more congenial clime." In plain words it means that .our Government would be duty-bound to conduct a campaign of proselytization among non-Christians and Jews and other non-Christians might be compelled to "seek some more congenial clime." We naturally look upon such proposals • as un-American. We know of no more congenial clime than the one in which we now live, and we intend to remain here. Therefore we contend that those who spoke for Jewry in opposition to the proposed amend- ment are the spokesmen for all American Jews. Fortunately, such opposition also is backed by all Americans who recognize the danger to the major principle of our land—the separation of church and state. The Abiding Jeffersonian Principle The opposition statement calls attention to the • frequent demands that have been made to have reference to the law of Christ in our Constitution, with the result, as Philip Schaff pointed out in his "Church and State in the United States," that, when our Constitution was being written, "two Presbyterian church groups resolved not to vote at elections until the Con- stitution should be amended to acknowledge the sovereignty of Christ. Reviewing the history of the battle against such injection of church influence into our Constitution, the Synagogue Council and NCRAC statement recalls the position taken by -Thomas Jefferson: IP "Even before our Constitution was enacted, the State of Virginia enacted Thomas Jefferson's great Statute of Religious Freedom. When that measure was being considered by the Vir- ginia legislature, an attempt was made to amend it so as to include a reference to Jesus Christ. Jefferson, in his autobiog- raphy, relates the incident in the following language: `The bill for establishing religious freedom, the principles of which had, to a certain degree, been enacted before, I had drawn in all the latitude of reason and right. It still met with opposition; but, with some mutilations in the preamble, it was finally passed; and a singular proposition proved that its pro- tection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the pre- amble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of 'the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the words "Jesus Christ," so that it should read, "a de- parture from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion"; the insertion was rejected by a great majority,' in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and tha Gentile, the Christian and the Mo- hamedan, the Hindoo, the infidel of every denomination'." In presenting the position of the Jewish community, the statement presented to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary quotes many authorities and makes reference to the defense of the American tradition whenever attempts were made to introduce Christian legislation in various states of the Union. Of special interest is this quotation from Dudley Field Malone's "American Progress in Jurisprudence": "The greatest achievement ever made in the cause of hu- man progress is the total and final separation of church and state. If we had nothing else to boast of, we could lay claim with justice that first among the nations we of this country made it an article of organic law that 'the relations between man and his Maker were a private concern, into which other men have no right to intrude. To measure the stride thus made for the Emancipation of the race, we have dreadful per- secutions in the name of religion that have filled the world." * * An Analysis of the Threat to American Jewry All American Jews should acquaint themselves with the ana- lysis of the position of American Jewry. The opposition statement makes this declaration: "Since the founding of the United States of America and the adoption of the Federal constitution, Jews have been full citizens of the United States and have given their wholehearted and unqualified support to the constitution. It is now proposed that a fundamental principle of American life be repudiated and that five million Jews (to say nothing of the many other non-Christian Americans) be reduced to a status of second- class citizens. "As a religious people devoted to 'the doctrines • of Judaism, Jews cannot in good conscience recognize "the law and author- ity of Jesus Christ as proposed in Senate Joint Resolution 87. Every Jew would consider an act of religious discrimination if - he were deprived of the right to give wholehearted and unquali- fied allegiance to every sentence of the American constitution and for conscience sake be compelled to make the slightest reservation in taking an oath of allegiance. Beyond this we see additional dangers. It is wholly possible that the insertion into the fundamental law of the United States of an explicit affirm- ation of Christian doctrine would not be permitted to remain a mere gesture. Next stages might well be the introduction by legislative action of instruction in Christian doctrine into the curriculum of the public schools or the imposition of religious tests for the exercise of the various rights of citizenship. How- ever, even if such consequences did not result, it must be em- phasized that the very existence of such a clause in a constitu- Great 'Thr e at Organized Anti-Semiticin 'Still Ever, Dr. John SlawSon Tells Detroit's. AJC Chapter Organized anti-Semitism has same time preserving our civil national issues with hate propa- changed its tactics but remains liberties. I Banda and by exploiting justifi- Martin Butzel presided at ; able • public anxiety concerning as great a threat as ever, Dr. the session. Chapter chairman the threat of Communism." John Slawson, is Philip Marcuse. He reported that in carrying executive v i e e- "Today as the American peo- out their subtle anti-Semitism president of the ple cope with the world-wide the anti-Semites denounced American Jew- threat of Communism and bend and "exposed" the United Na-• ish Committee, their energies to resolve many tions and UNESCO "with vary; told a luncheon other crucial problems," Dr. ing degrees of calumny, rang- meeting of Slawson declared, "it is more ing from brashness to subtle AJC's Detroit than ever necessary to guard innuendo." chapter in the„, against malicious movements "The threat of bigotry pollUt- Sheraton-Cadil- striving to foment racial and re- ing the American atmosphere lac Hotel, Tues- ligious discord. Many of these can best be averted by an alert Dr. Slawson day. movements have now abandoned American public," Dr. Slawson The leader of the pioneer their former overt appeals to stated. "Hate-mongers and their American organization combat- bigotry in favor of more subtle machinations must be exposed, ting bigotry warned that the tactics to which the public must as the AJC has been doing for Communists "hope to paralyze be alerted." nearly a half century. It is the our resistance to both internal Citing the recent report and obligation of respectable lead- and external threat that their appraisal by the American Jew- ers and supporters of various movement represents to us and ish Committee on anti-Semitic movements to dissociate them- the free world" by reviving one activity in the United States, selves from groups which cannot of their old slogans: Anti- Dr. Slawson said that to- dislodge the anti-Semites, Communism Is American Fas- day's anti-Semites are using to persuade other men of and good cism." He said we must main- more subtle approaches to pub- will to do likewise. tain "a clear perspective" in lic opinion "by salting public Dr. Slawson asserted that fighting Communism and at the discussion of national and inter- Communism's threat to our freedom is not lessened "by tional amendment would be a challenge to the faith of every the fact that some of those believing Jew. purporting to combat it would destroy those historic safe- "Such proposals as this are not new in American history. guards which are guaran tees They have been repeatedly rejected despite the fact that the of freedom." great majority of American citizens are of Christian faith be- "The attack on civil liberties," cause it was recognized that to adopt such a policy would be to he added, "is likewise a danger depart from that broad and untrammeled freedom which has made it possible for men of all religions to work together in the confronting our country, not lessened because it comes from building of the world's greatest democracy. It can be safely those who speak in the name of stated that every American Jew will pray fervently to the God patriotism. of his fathers that this proposal will not be accepted, for should "All Americans truly concern- it be adopted, this country will no longer be the America we ed with preserving our way 'of have known till now. , life must not be diverted from "In a few months the Jews of the United States will cele- their purpose by propaganda brate the 300th Anniversary of Jewish settlement in North that exposure of Communism America. This is an occasion to which we have looked forward constitutes fascism or by charges with the greatest pride and enthusiasm as a means of re- ■ that non-conformity or opposi- affirming our full identity with the land through which we have tion to native demagogues con,- been so greatly blessed and to the development of which we stitutes Communism. An inform- have contributed in no small degree. It is our prayer that this ed, alert and united citizenry is 300th anniversary will be celebrated as an occasion of deep and the best requirement for a suc- spiritual joy and will not be turned into an occasion of sorrow cessful fight against both these because of the spectre of the proposal now under consideration dangers to freedom." by this Committee." The Synagogue Council and. NCRAC statement adequately covers the subject and makes an excellent case in defense of the Leon Kay Endorses basic American ideal of separation, although, in fact, it merely Mayas ZOA.' s Head scratches the surface of the vast subject. .••• Iieoh Kay, Detroit Zionist The Famous Blaine Amendment leader, president of the Michi- Scores of books have been written on the subject of separa- gan Zionist Region, is one of 14 tion. One of the most important of these books is the compila- Zionist region heads who - have tion by William Addison Blakely, in behalf of the Religious Lib- ''endorsed Morti- erty Association, under the title "American State Papers and mer May of Related Documents on Freedom in Religion." In it is quoted the Nashville, Tenn the text of the amendment proposed by James G. Blaine, in 1875, for the presi: providing that: dency of the "No State shall make any law respecting an establishment Zionist Organi- of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; and no zation of Amer- money raised by taxation in any State, for the support of public ica. schools, or derived from any public fund therefor, nor any pub- A strong cam- lic lands devoted thereto,'shall ever be under the control of any paign has been religious sect, nor shall any money so raised, or lands so devoted launched in be divided between religious sects or denominations." May's behalf, An editorial note in "American State Papers" on Blaine's but during the proposed amendment is of great historic value. Mr. Blakely ex- past week it be- plained: M. May came evident "December 14, 1875, Hon. James G. Blaine proposed an that he will have opposition, with Max Bressler of Chicago amendment to the Constitution. It was not acted upon, how- ever, until August 4, 1876, when it was passed in the House with as a certain candidate and with the possibility that Abra- the almost unanimous vote of "Yeas, 180," to "Nays, 7." The ham Redelheim of New York Judiciary Committee has added the words, "This article shall not vest, enlarge, or diminish legislative power in Congress." also will enter the race. In the Senate, it was further amended, but failed to secure the necessary two-thirds vote, the vote standing, "Yeas, 28," to Report 37 Border Clashes "Nays, 16" on August 14. Both the great political parties that By Jordan to UN Body year inserted in their platforms declarations on the government and religion, the Democratic party declaring: "We do here re- UNITED NATIO-NS, N.Y., affirm our faith in • . the total separation of church and state, (JTA)—The Israel government for the sake alike of civil and religious freedom. informed the United Nations "This was a proposition to prohibit the States from doing what the Constitution, by its first amendment, forbids the na- Security Council of 37 border tional Government from doing. Instead of "Congress shall clashes precipitated by Jordan make no law," etc., this said, "No State shall make any law forces in a 43-day period be- respecting an establishment of religion," etc. The idea was to tween March 30 and May 11. In a letter to the Council, Is- make the application of the principle of separation of church and state here complete. The adoption of this amendment rael listed an attack on a pas- senger train, the sending of would have rendered unconstitutional every State Sunday law in the United States. While the original States composing the armed bands into Israel territory and an attempted kidnapping. Union, in doing away with their religious establishments as In every instance, the letter pin- such, followed the principle adopted by the national Govern- ned responsibility for the border ment, nearly all, if not all, still retained that which was the real incidents on Jordan. The letter germ and taproot of those establishments—their Sunday laws. was sent to the Council instead This amendment would have done away with these and all of to the Israel-Jordan Mixed other forms of state patronage and support to religion. The Armistice Commission because amendment should have been adopted. Since then the tide has Israel is boycotting the MAC for set in the other way, as witnessed in the great revival of Sun- its failure to hold Jordan re- day legislation throughout the States, hundreds of thousands of spotisible for the Scorpion Pass dollars contributed by the government to schools under sec- massacre. tarian control, and Congress besieged with petitions and bills for Sunday legislation and a religious amendment to the Con- Neo-Nazis Indicted stitution." HAMBURG, (JTA)—Two head The American position is clear on the subject. We have no men of a neo-Nazis movement, fears about the outcome of hearings on Senator Flanders' pro- Hermann Lamp. and Eberhard posal. His proferred amendment offers another opportunity for a HaWranke, have been indicted review of the basic American principle of separation. In the by the West German Attorney action taken by American Jewry, we merely regret that once General for conspiracy and for again we have evidence of a split in our ranks, as evidenced by leading a secret, subversive or- the action of the American Jewish Committee which has found ganization. it necessary to submit a statement of its own in opposition to the Flanders amendment. In fighting for separation we have the painful task of regretting separatism and separatists on even 2—DETROIT JEWISH NEWS Friday, May 28, 1954 most elementary issues in Jewish ranks. ■•■•••■■■•■ . *.