American Jewish Committee Split Causes Repercussions Tells Stand on Palestine Refused to Be Bound by Zionists' Political Ambitions for National Homeland is Reason for Quitting Con- ference; Cites Statement of Views The statement of the American Jewish Committee explaining its withdrawal from the American Jewish Conference follows in full: ."The American Jewish Com- mittee associated itself with the American Jewish Conference in the hope that through meetings of representatives of Jewish or- ganizations and communities in a consultative body, an endeaver might be made to achieve a pro- gram for unity of action with re- spect to Jewish problems in the post-war world. "The American Jewish Com- mittee has at all times taken the position that the American Jew- ish Conference should be exact- ly what the name implies,—a conference, that is . to say, a de- liberative body, fairly repre- s entative of a cross-section of American Jewry, and that it should not be an authoritative or permanent body superimposed upon the structure of Jewish life in America. Consequently the Committee entered the Confer- ence on two conditions: (1) the character, and accordingly the name of the project should be changed from "Assembly" to "Conference"; and (2) the right of any participating organization to dissent from and, so dissenting, not to be bound by the conclu- sions of the Conference, should be recognized. These two condi- tions were accepted. "As the election machinery de- veloped, it became evident that the inclusion of overlapping or- ganizations, on the one hand, and the exclusion of large local and national agencies, on the other, would necessarily result in a gathering in which significant segments of the Jewish popula- tion would have virtually no voice. Prior to the actual meet- ing of the Conference, we called the attention of its Executive Committee to this situation. Our protest pointed out that the or- ganizations excluded 'constituted the backbone of- a substantial part of every Jewish community and that to exclude them is to confine membership in the Con- ference to restricted groups in the comm _ unity,' Unified Course of Conduct was Expected • "Nevertheless we still deemed it our duty to confer. We contin- ued association with the Confer- ence in the hope that by mutual exchange of views there might be consideration for a unified course of conduct with respect to the problems within the scope of the Conference. However, to a large extent the delegates, though elected as community representa- tives, came to the Conference with voting instructions, and a large number of delegates felt that their action was determined by virtue of decisions Made by official Zionist bodies. Hence, to our deep regret, there was no adequate opportunity for an ex- change of views and the charac- ter of the meeting as a Confer- ence was essentially destroyed. Indeed, some organizations which had both Zionist and non-Zion- ist members felt obliged to re- frain from voting. Equality for Jewish Citizens in Every Land Is Emphasized "The resolutions with respect to Palestine were thus adopted without opportunity to effect a possible adjustment between ul- timate political Zionist aspira- tions and the position held by a vast number of Jews not affili- ated with official Zionist bodies. These resolutions were, in our judgment, not in the best inter- ests of Jews throughout the world, including Palestine. There- fore, we had no alternative but to dissent. "In its Statement of Views adopted last January, the Ameri- can Jewish Committee set forth its principles and program. In that statement we pledged our- selves with all Americans to the Friday, November' S, 11- 43 THE JEWISH NEWS Page Eight winning of the war and the achievement for the whole world of the Four. Freedoms and the blessings of the Atlantic Charter. We urged upon the United Na- tions relief from the havoc and ruin inflicted by Axis barbarism on millions of human beings, es- pecially Jews, their repatriations, rehabilitation and the complete restoration and safeguarding of their equal civil and religious rights; the implementation of a program under international su- pervision that shall facilitate vol- untary settlement of refugees in other countries; reaffirmation of the principle that Jewish citi- zens of every land shall be guar- anteed the right of complete equality. The acceptance of these principles and the realization of these measures continue to be of first importance. Non-Zionists Also Helped Achievements in Palestine "We join with all our fellow Jews in proud recognition of the achievements of the Jewish Set- tlement in Palestine where there has been built up a flourishing economic life and a satisfying spiritual and cultural life. These achievements have been the re- sult of the work not only of Zion- ists but also of non-Zionists. Leaders of the American Jewish Committee were in the forefront of the efforts which culminated in the enlargement of the Jewish agency, and the American Jew- ish Committee jointed with Zion- ist organizations in proteSts against policies which appeared calculated to place obstacles in the way of the progress of the Jewish Settlement in Palestine. Non-Zionists as well as Zionists helped establish the Hebrew Uni- versity, promoted substantial cul- tural, religious and economic ac- tivities in Palestine, and contrib- uted generously to the support of the efforts to establish the Jewish Settlement in Palestine on a firm foundation. "But despite the recognized achievements of the Jewish Set- tlement in Palestine, it cannot, in the light of the realities of Jewish life in the world, alone furnish the solution of the prob- lem of post-war Jewish rehabili- tation. In our Statement of Views we recognized the wide diver- gence of opinion with respect to the future government of Pales- tine, and we emphasized that un- der existing conditions in Pales- tine and in the world there should be no preconceived form- ula at this time as to the perma- nent political structure which should obtain there. Wants to Preserve Free Position on Palestine "We affirmed and reaffirm that whatever government be es- tablished ultimately in Palestine, there can be no political identi- fication of Jews outside of Pal- estine with such government. This must be emphasized and we deem it our duty to preserve a position free and untrammelled to urge this view. "In accordance with our State- ment of ViewS we approve for the present for Palestine an in- ternational trusteeship responsi- ble to the United Nations for the following purposes:' To safe- guard the Jewish Settlement in, and Jewish immigration into, Palestine, and to guarantee ade- quate scope for future growth and development to the full ex- tent of the economic absorptive capacity of the country; to safe- guard and protect the fundamen- tal rights of all inhabitants; to safeguard and protect the holy places of all faiths; and to pre- pare the country to become, within a reasonable period of years, a self-governing Common- wealth under a • Constitution and a Bill of Rights that will safe- guard and protect these purposes and basic rights for all. We thus tendered an affirmative program of conduct to which we believed and believe that Zionist and non- Throughout U.S. Withdrawal of the American Jewish Committee from the American Jewish Conference has brought serious repercus- sions throughout the country, and organizations and indi- viduals have, in turn, resigned from the American Jewish Committee. Following the example set by Hadassah, the Executive Council of the Rabbinical As- sembly, the Order Free Sons of Israel, the Minneapolis Fed- edration for Jewish Service, Independent Order Brith Abraham, David M. Watch- maker of Boston and Albert D. Schanzer of Brooklyn, re- signed from the American Jewish Committee in protest against its action. The exodus from the Amer- ican Jewish Committee was started when Mrs. David De- Sola Pool, Judge Louis Levin- thal and Magistrate Morris Rothenberg resigned from the Committee. In answer to the American Jewish Committee's statement explainin g its stand, the American Zionist Emergency Council accuses the Commit- tee of breaking with a tradi- tion for Palestine's recon- struction established by the late Louis Marshall. The statements of both the American Jewish Committee and the Zionist Emergency Council are presented here by The Jewish News. Zionist alike might accord sup- port. "As opposed to this, at a time when the Jews in Palestine con- stitute approximately one-third of the population, the Confer- ence made the immediate de- mand for the exclusive exercise by a Jewish body of the sover- eign right to control immigra- tion and for the establishment of a Jewish Commonwealth. From such demands, clearly incapable of immediate realization, there was bound to be grave dissent. To our regret we could get no consideration for the plea for the withholding of these ultimate, divisive demands in order to concentrate upon present unity of action on matters upon which there was complete agreement— such as the abrogation of the White Paper, which terminates immigration into Palestine. Considers Committee's Attitude Sound "We are profoundly convinced that in the interests of the de- velopment of the Jewish Settle- ment in Palestine itself, as well as the security and welfare of the Jews throughout the world, the position taken by the Ameri- can Jewish Committee is sound, and that in view of international conditions it is an error to insist upon these ultimate political proposals. We deem it vital that in the interest of Jewry it should be made clear that the assertion of such extreme demands has been inacceptable to large seg- ments of American Jewry. "The salvation and rehabilita- tion of the stricken Jews of Eur- ope cannot be achieved through Palestine alone, and certainly not by over-emphasis on the pa- Meal constitution of Palestine. It can be achieved only by consid- ering Palestine a part of the lar- ger program which looks to the rehabilitation of Jews through- out the world and the restora- tion of their equal rights. "Holding these views, we do not see how, on the one hand we can in good conscience usefully continue membership in the Con- ference which, through its Inter- im Committee, is now seeking to implement the .Resolutions from which we dissented, or, on the other hand, how that Committee, on which we have been asked to take our place, could function un- embarrassed were we to remain as a dissenting element. More- over, in view of the fact that (Continued on Page 13). Zionist Emergency Council Assails Committee's Action Withdrawal of Committee Regarded as an Attack Upon Jewish Unity; Fears Danger of Exaggerating Significance of Group's Decision The newly-organized Zionist Emergency Council, taking issue with the American Jewish Com- mittee's statement, issued the following reply: "There is the danger of exag- gerating the significance of the secession of the American Jew- ish Committee froni the Ameri- can Jewish Conference beyond all proportions in the light of the relative insignificance of the Committee in American Jewish life. "The American Jewish Com- mittee and the American Jewish Conference are not correlative bodies. The Committee is a self- constituted and self-perpetuating body representative of no one except a few individuals, and re- sponsible to no one at all. On the other hand, the Conference is the democratically elected body of American Jewry consisting of 502 delegates, of whom 375 were elected from every major com- munity and the remainder were designated by 65 national organ- izations of which the American Jewish Committee was one. Conference Represented Virtual Unanimity in American Jewry "The withdrawal of the Corn- mittee is nevertheless a calcu- lated attack upon Jewish unity and it will be deeply resented by every American Jew who is eager to advance the Conference program of immediate rescue of the Jews of Europe, their post- war rehabilitation and the im- plementation of Jewish rights to Palestine. "The Conference deliberations revealed the virtual unanimity of American Jewry on all major problems and the profound de- sire for unity in achieving their solution. On the Palestine resolu- tion only four of the 502 dele- gates dissented, while less than 20 abstained. The mass enthusi- asm for the Conference program was persuasive upon the chair- man of the American Jewish Committee who announced at the time that the Palestine reso- lution was adopted that the Com- mittee would remain within the Conference. But it now seems to have been only a temporary maneuver. The Committee now refuses to accept the will of the majority. It quits the Conference. It has always preached unity but evidently only on its own terms. The Committee must rule or ruin. It will do neither. Calls Arguments of American Jewish Committee "Absurd" "As an excuse for isolating it- self from the overwhelming ma- jority in American Jewish life, the American Jewish Committee complains that the Conference subordinate all other issues to the question of Palestine. This is absurd. Every major problem af- fecting Jewish interests was seri- ously and at great length con- sidered by the Conference and its committees, and this in spite of Zionist Council Steps Up Fight On White Paper The American Zionist Emerg- ency Council has reorganized in a move to decentralize respon- sibility and to speed mobilization of all forces in American Jewry to further Jewish aspirations in Palestine, it was announced by Dr. Abba Hillel Silver, chair-) man of the executive committee. Fourteen committees have been established to carry for- ward an unprecedented •pro- gram to win public opinion in America. The immediate objec- tive of all the committees is to Work for the abandonment of the White Paper policy under which Great Britain would shut off all Jewish immigration into Palestine by May 1944. the chairman of the American Jewish Committee, who, it should be recalled, resisted the inclusion of the question of rescue in the Conference agenda. If Palestine's future played a major role in the Conference, and absorbed in a large measure the interests of the delegates, it is precisely be-. cause they realized that Pales- tine offers the one great construc- tive solution both to the problem of immediate rescue and the problem of Jewish national homelessness. "The American Jewish Com- mittee wishes now to ignore not only the expressed wishes of American Jewry but also the facts of history and its own rec- ord on the subject of Palestine. It is clear that a new regime has come into control of the policies and attitudes of the Committee. In the past, the Committee ap- proved of the Balfour Declara-, , tion and of • the Palestine Man- date which recognizes the his- toric connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and its right to rebuild its national home there. Under the inspira, tion of the late Louis Marshall, who was president of the Ameri- can Jewish Committee, an en- larged Jewish Agency for Pal- estine was achieved, which in- cluded both Zionists and non- Zionists and which was based upon the acceptance of the prin- ciple of the Jewish National Home, Declare Committee Would Liq- uidate National Home "But . today the American Jew- ish Committee studiously and pointedly omits any reference to the Jewish National Home, the Balfour Declaration or the Man- date. These annoying facts of his- tory it would like to erase. It speaks of a Commonwealth for Palestine but not of a Jewish Commonwealth. Its present po- sition would liquidate the Jew- ish National Home. As the Amer- ican Jewish Committee would have it, the Jewish National Home must not be Jewish and it must not be national. Inevitably, it would cease to be a home. Sees Retreat to Committee's 1916 Stand "The American Jewish Com- mittee has always represented it- self as desirous of safeguarding Jewish rights all over the world. But as far as Jewish Palestine is concerned, where our people has obtained internationally accred- ited rights for the rebuilding of its national home, the Commit- tee interposes compromises and reservations and would oppose every safeguard essential for the realization of that home. 'Warn That Committee's Efforts Will Fail "It generously allows that Jews should have . the right to immigrate to Palestine as to other countries. This we are to regard as a tremendous conces- sion! But it insists that the Jew- ish Agency must under rio cir- cumstances be vested with con- trol over immigration, for that would mean that in the course. of time, a Jewish majority would be established in Palestine and as a result the Jewish Common- wealth would be constituted. This must not be allowed to hap- pen! Immigration is therefore to be entrusted to some interna- tional trusteeship which the American Jewish Committee now improvises out of thin air. "This reversal on the part of the American Jewish Committee, representing a new and disruptive line in its policies, is clearly a re- treat to 1916, when a small hand- ful of Jews in this count} :y and in England violently opposed the Balfour Declaration and attemp- ted to arrest the march of the Jewish people to its rightful place in the .world's family of nations. They failed then. They will fail now!".